One of the things we’ve been working on behind the scenes is getting submission guidelines for both the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog up. The former pays ten cents a word, the latter six cents. They’re looking for much the same sort of content, things of interest to professional genre writers; blog articles are a bit shorter and more informal.
You do not have to be a SFWA member to write for either publication. I’ve done a number of pieces for both, most recently a series on teaching workshops that finishes up soon.
If you’re not familiar with the blog, it runs a number of articles that are useful, including tips on tools, new markets, industry news, and writing advice.
Want access to a lively community of writers and readers, free writing classes, co-working sessions, special speakers, weekly writing games, random pictures and MORE for as little as $2? Check out Cat’s Patreon campaign.
"(On the writing F&SF workshop) Wanted to crow and say thanks: the first story I wrote after taking your class was my very first sale. Coincidence? nah….thanks so much."
~K. Richardson
You may also like...
So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish
The Nebulas this year were an amazing, dazzling, staggering blur, and an overall splendid time. (I got a selfie with William Gibson plus shared french fries with an astronaut!). But there was one sad thing for me, which was that in all the shuffle and mistimings, I didn’t get a chance to deliver the speech I’d prepared.
I’ve been spending some time post-Nebulas thinking and reflecting on everything I’ve learned from the SFWA Presidency, and all the valuable things I’ve discovered and learned as a result of my time in office. Over the next few weeks, I’ll publish the blog posts I have been putting together, one dedicated to each year, and then a final recap. It seemed a logical thing to kick that series off by sharing that speech, which contains a number of things I wanted to say to the SFWA family at large. I hope this serves.
Six Nebulas ago, Steven Gould approached me. He needed someone who’d be willing to run for Vice President the following year, picking up a one year term as SFWA made the transition to staggering the terms of the Vice President and President. He promised me it would be only a one year obligation. Insert hollow laugh here.
July 1st will mark a big transition in my life: after five years on the SFWA board, spending one year as Vice President under Steven Gould, and then two terms as President. I have spent more time on the SFWA board than most people do getting their college degree, and that is an odd thought. General wisdom is that the SFWA Presidency eats a book a year; I have definitely found that true, and I suspect a large number of stories got consumed as well. I am looking forward to becoming actually productive again.
But there have been a multitude of compensations. A wealth of friendships. An abundance of moments that delighted my heart or that felt like tremendous victories. There is a tendency to label SFWA governance toxic, to imply that it destroys the soul and hollows one out. I am pleased to report that this is not actually the case, that I have found it, on the whole, a community that is welcoming and well-intentioned, though not always graceful in expressing it. I step down feeling the better for the five years in which I have learned and grown.
I have presided over both the first and the second all-female President/Vice President teams in SFWA history, the first time M.C.A. Hogarth and myself, the second time Erin Hartshorn and myself. I had thought that perhaps now handing the Presidency over to Mary Robinette Kowal represented another historic first, only to find this was not so. The first female to female SFWA Presidency exchange actually took place in 2003, when Sharon Lee handed the reins over to Catherine Asaro. I’m taking part in a panel tomorrow called “We Have Always Been Here,” about women in science fiction and this underscored that truth. We have indeed always been here, doing much of the work that drives this community.
Three women have been working with me side by side every moment of this remarkable journey, and all three remain with SFWA, for which you are all very lucky. I ask them to stand as I mention them, and for a round of applause at the end, because without them I could not have stayed the course.
The first is Sarah Pinsker, who agreed to come onto the board at the same time I did and who has remained a Director at Large whose thoughtful, considered presence has contributed enormously to discussions, as well as seeing through multiple projects, including but not limited to the Baltimore Book Festival and the Mentoring Program, and being a consistent voice for marginalized writers.
The second is Oz Drummond, who has been part of the financial team first under the inestimable Bud Sparhawk, and then under the equally awesome Nathan Lowell, and who has worked to learn more about how a nonprofit 501C3 works than anyone else I know. I have seen much of Oz’s surroundings during our weekly SFWA video calls, as well as her cats, the wild turkeys, and various backyard deer. I will greatly miss those conversations.
The third is Kate Baker, our Executive Director, with whom I have fought shoulder to shoulder against the forces of chaos, miscommunication, and random bad luck. I cannot say enough about Kate, or we would be here forever, but suffice it to say, any team she is on is lucky to have her. Not just love, but mad props to you, Kate, for the amazing job you’ve done during my five years on the board.
And finally, thank you to you all, not just the people in this room, but the SFWA members watching or reading from afar. Thank you for your trust, your advice, your support, and your friendship. Thank you for the many times you reached out to tell me I was doing a good job. And thank you to the ones who weren’t afraid to call me on it when you thought I wasn’t. I have tried to validate your trust and, like you, to be welcoming and well-intentioned, though not always graceful in expressing it. I hope these inadequate words meet with your approval. And congratulations to Mary Robinette again, with many thanks for being willing to run for the office.
End speech and then we would all go drink and listen to the Alternate Universe acceptance speeches, which is perhaps where this speech should have been delivered. 🙂
As I said up above, in coming weeks there will be posts recapping some of the highs and lows, occasionally drawing back the SFWA curtain.
As I’m composing them, I’m asking you for a favor. If there is some SFWA moment that has been particularly meaningful for you in the past five years, I’d love to hear about it. I’d also love to know if there is a SFWA volunteer or volunteers that have helped make your experiences with SFWA positive. This is YOUR chance to give them a shout-out; drop me an e-mail about it!
The Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America, an august non-profit on whose board I have served in the past, held its business meeting in January of this year, and since it was virtual, I had the chance to attend, which was a nice chance to see some familiar faces, meet some new ones, and hear what the organization has been up to in the past year.
An interesting development for SFWA that seems to have been flying under most people’s radar is that the organization’s members will be voting on whether or not to change the membership requirements in a way that the organization has not previously done. This may be one of the biggest changes made to the membership yet in the organization’s 50+ years of history.
The new qualifications: a writer can join as an Associate member once they have earned $100 over the course of their career, and as a Full member at the $1000 level.
That’s a huge and very significant change from the current, somewhat arcane membership requirements of $1000 over the course of a year on a single work to become a Full member. Particularly when you think that one of the most contentious propositions on the discussion boards in the past has been the idea of re-qualification, of making people prove they qualify on a yearly basis. Moving away from a system so complicated SFWA had to create a webform to walk people through whether or not they qualified to something like this is a big win in so many ways.
Why I’m absolutely voting yes:
This change makes SFWA available to more people in the earlier stages of their career, which is often when they most need that community, support, and advice.
More and more varied members will make the Nebulas a heck of a lot more interesting and perhaps combat some of the logrolling that I’ve witnessed over twenty or so years. This has the potential to really shake things up in a good way.
More and more varied members means more volunteers and budget and that’s huge. One of the best things about admitting indie writers was the wealth of knowledge, experience, and enthusiasm added to the organization overall. This is even more of that.
That also means more people talking on the boards. I’ve been a moderator on those boards for a long, long time, and they remain a source of community, news, and information for me. The more the merrier, in my opinion.Â
This change also opens up the game writing qualifications in a way that answers a lot of the existing issues. SFWA’s admitting game writers has been a bit bumpy, mainly because of the incredible variety of ways that writing can manifest.
On a small personal level, it may mean I’ll witness less truculent bullshit from people personally affronted by the existence of the past requirements, although people will continue to think SFWA is a gelatinous cube.
For this to pass, enough of the full members need to vote on it. If you are a full member, I urge you to check your email for the mail with the voting link, which would have come on January 15, with the subject “[SFWA] 2022 Call for SFWA Board Candidates & Bylaws Vote”. The cut-off date for getting this done is February 15, a rapidly approaching deadline.
One other change from the board meeting answers the question of how this affects the idea of “SFWA qualifying markets,” which has in the past been used as a way to make sure fiction markets increased their rates every once in a while. We’re going to see a fiction matrix that looks at a number of factors, including pay, but also response time, quality of contract, etc. It’s very nice to see this long overdue project finally manifest, and I bear as much guilt as anyone in the long overdue part, since I was around when it was first proposed and should have kicked it along significantly harder than I did. I’m very happy to see this and ten thousand kudos to the people who made it happen.
There wasn’t much else to the meeting that surprised me. Like a lot of the F&SF organizations in 2021, live events have been a problem. (This surprised me given that SFWA was one of the first organizations to put on a pandemic version in a way that really showcased what a virtual event could be.) But hotel and event stuff has been problematic for a lot of events, to the point where some seem moribund or seriously endangered, and given that, it’s unsurprising that cancellation costs of the event have wounded the SFWA budget.
Overall though, SFWA remains pretty robust financially, and the Emergency Medical Fund, Legal Fund, and Givers Grants programs are still doing stellar work. You’ve seen some of that continue to play out in the DisneyMustPay campaign. I will remind people that it’s a good place to direct charitable donations, and that you can also support it through the Amazon Smile program, buying SFWA’s Storybundles and HumbleBundles, or even by buying one of those cool secret decoder rings.
31 Responses
RT @Catrambo: SFWA Bulletin and Blog Submission Guidelines: https://t.co/vxWhLkT8kM
RT @Catrambo: SFWA Bulletin and Blog Submission Guidelines: https://t.co/vxWhLkT8kM
RT @Catrambo: SFWA Bulletin and Blog Submission Guidelines: https://t.co/vxWhLkT8kM
Cat Rambo: SFWA Bulletin and Blog Submission Guidelines https://t.co/2zE0jYmGoY
RT @Catrambo: SFWA Bulletin and Blog Submission Guidelines: https://t.co/vxWhLkT8kM
RT @Catrambo: SFWA Bulletin and Blog Submission Guidelines: https://t.co/vxWhLkT8kM
RT @Catrambo: SFWA Bulletin and Blog Submission Guidelines: https://t.co/vxWhLkT8kM
RT @Catrambo: SFWA Bulletin and Blog Submission Guidelines: https://t.co/vxWhLkT8kM
SFWA Bulletin and Blog Submission Guidelines https://t.co/q5QBGbSCvs
RT @SFWAauthors: Cat Rambo: SFWA Bulletin and Blog Submission Guidelines https://t.co/2zE0jYmGoY
RT @SFWAauthors: Cat Rambo: SFWA Bulletin and Blog Submission Guidelines https://t.co/2zE0jYmGoY
2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: 2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: 2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: 2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: 2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: 2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: 2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: 2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: 2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: 2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: 2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: 2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: 2 good nonfiction markets for freelancers: the SFWA Bulletin and the SFWA Blog – https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
You don’t have to be a SFWA member to write for the blog or the SFWA Bulletin: https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
@Catrambo no wait, I had better not, I am hated enough already.
RT @Catrambo: You don’t have to be a SFWA member to write for the blog or the SFWA Bulletin: https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: You don’t have to be a SFWA member to write for the blog or the SFWA Bulletin: https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: You don’t have to be a SFWA member to write for the blog or the SFWA Bulletin: https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: You don’t have to be a SFWA member to write for the blog or the SFWA Bulletin: https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk
RT @Catrambo: You don’t have to be a SFWA member to write for the blog or the SFWA Bulletin: https://t.co/dae0n7h0rk